Bhagwana Ram v. HUDA and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed an application for leave to file an appeal, noting that the present appeal is squarely covered by the orders in Murti Devi's case and Narbadi Dev's case, and disposed of the same accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Leave to file appeal sought in relevant application is granted and the File No. CM 15678-CI-2015 is disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.9709 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.1.2016
Bhagwana Ram
.. Appellant
Vs.
Haryana Urban Development Authority and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Ajay Jain, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Arun Beniwal, DAG, Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J.
CM No. 15678-CI-2015
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bhagwana Ram
- respondent
Haryana Urban Development Authority
Coram
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/9709/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court