Appeal dismissed as disposed of in terms of a prior order in Ram Kala's case on the grounds of ad idem counsel.
Appeal disposed of in terms of the order dated 27.11.2015 in RFA No. 3192 of 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 549 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.3.2016
Variam Singh Arora
.. Appellant
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present: Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Arun Beniwal, DAG, Haryana.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that present appeal is squarely covered by the order dated 27.11.2015 passed by this Court in RFA No. 3192 of 2015 ( Ramkala Vs. State of Haryana and others). They jointly pray for disposal of the present appeal in terms of the order dated 27.11.2015 passed in Ram Kala's case (supra).
In view of the above common stand taken by learned counsel for the parties, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the order dated 27.11.2015 passed in Ram Kala's case (supra).
Disposed of, accordingly.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK ) JUDGE
01.3.2016 AK Sharma
AMIT KUMAR 2016.03.02 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ramkala Vs. State of HaryanaFollowed¶13
RFA No. 3192 of 2015
Variam Singh Arora
State of Haryana
Rameshwar Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
