This one-line order dismisses an application filed under the garb of a review to argue an appeal on merits, holding such a procedure cannot be entertained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA No.55-CI of 2016 (O&M) in RFA No.2019 of 2011 Date of decision: 9.5.2016
Dalbir Singh
..... Applicant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh
..... Non-applicant
/Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for Mr. P.C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the applicant.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
Under the garb of review application, the appeal is sought to be argued on merits referring to a subsequent judgment, which cannot be entertained.
Dismissed. Consequently, the application seeking condonation of delay is also dismissed.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
9.5.2016
sharmila
SHARMILA 2016.05.11 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review application can be used to argue the appeal on merits.
Dalbir Singh
Union Territory, Chandigarh
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
