An order referring the case to another judgment (Mangtu vs. State of Punjab) in the same court for detailed reasons, with no separate opinion recorded on this date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA-RF No.3-CI of 2016 (O&M) in RFA No.1523 of 2003 Date of decision: 23.9.2016
Tilak Raj
..... Applicant
Versus
Punjab State and others
......Non-applicants /Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: None for the applicant.
Mr. Piyush Bansal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
RAJESH BINDAL, J
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed
today in RA-RF No.1-CI of 2016 in RFA No.1525 of 2003 titled as Mangtu
vs. State of Punjab and others.
(RAJESH BINDAL)
JUDGE
23.9.2016 sharmila
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sharmila Devi 2016.09.29 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tilak Raj
Punjab State
RAJESH BINDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
