This single paragraph ordered judgment in favor of the respondent, dismissing the pending appeal by relying on the earlier decision in LPA No.1674 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LPA-1465-2016 Date of Decision: September 27, 2016
Nirmal Singh and others
.....Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No 3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 4. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No 5. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.
.......
Present: Mr.JPS Sidhu, Advocate for the appellants.
SURYA KANT, J.
For the reasons assigned in LPA No.1674 of 2016 ( Beant Singh and others vs State of Punjab and others ), decided on 05.09.2016, the instant appeal also fails and is hereby dismissed.
| ( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|
| September 27, 2016 | ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) |
| meenuss | JUDGE |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | : Yes/No |
Meenu 2016.10.03 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Beant Singh and others vs State of Punjab and othersRelied on¶13
LPA No.1674 of 2016 ( Beant Singh and others vs State of Punjab and others )
Nirmal Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
SURYA KANT
SUDIP AHLUWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
