In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1211 of 2016, the Single Judge dismissed the appeal as premature, granting liberty to the appellant to pursue a review application before the learned judge.
Appellant granted liberty to file review before the Single Judge and to file new appeal later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Letters Patent Appeal No.1211 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 07, 2016
Smt.Vidya Devi ......Appellant
versus
State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.
*******
Present: Mr.Manohar Lall, Advocate, for the appellant.
-.-
Surya Kant, J . (Oral)
The appellant has filed Review Application also which is stated to be listed before the learned Single Judge on 16.09.2016.
We thus dismiss this appeal at this stage as pre-mature with liberty to the appellant to pursue the Review Application before the learned Single Judge. She shall be at liberty to file appeal on the same cause of action, if occasion arises, after the decision of the Review Application.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
September 07, 2016 [SUDIP AHLUWALIA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.09.08 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Smt. Vidya Devi
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
