Single judge order condoning a delay of 1582 days in re-filing an appeal and referring to the earlier judgment in FAO No.1585 of 2011 for reasons and orders.
The delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned; the appeal disposed of with reference to FAO No.1585 of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.6545 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 2.9.2016
Food Corporation of India
... Appellant
Versus
M/s Aggarwal Enterprises and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present: Mr.K.K.Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Arpandeep Narula, Advocate, for Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. *********
AMIT RAWAL, J. (Oral)
CM No.31733-CII-2012
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 1582 days
in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
FAO No.6545 of 2012
For orders, see FAO No.1585 of 2011; FCI v. M/s Raj Group of
Industries and others.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE September 2, 2016 Paritosh Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Paritosh Kumar 2016.09.20 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Food Corporation of India
M/s Aggarwal Enterprises and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
