The Court referred another judgment (CWP No. 27024 of 2013) and stayed proceedings in this writ petition by reference to it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P No. 27395 of 2013 Date of decision:-20.01.2016
Sanjeev
.. .. Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Samarvir Singh, DAG, Haryana
Ms. Avnika Gupta, Advocate, for Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No. 4
RITU BAHRI , J.
For detailed order, see CWP No. 27024 of 2013 titled as Jai
Bhagwan v. State of Haryana and others , decided vide separate
order of even date, by this Court.
( RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
20.01.2016
G Arora
GAURAV ARORA 2016.02.19 13:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jai Bhagwan v. State of HaryanaReferred¶14
CWP No. 27024 of 2013 titled as Jai Bhagwan v. State of Haryana and others
Sanjeev
State of Haryana
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
