Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition is withdrawn as a civil suit has been filed. The court granted instructions accordingly, resulting in disposal without reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 24685 of 2015 Date of decision: 09.12.2016
Shastri Shiksha Samiti, Khanak
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. N.P. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
None for respondent no. 6.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner
has been given instructions to withdraw the present writ petition since resort has been made to filing of a civil suit.
Ordered accordingly.
09.12.2016 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Shivani Gupta 2016.12.09 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Shivani Gupta 2016.12.09 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Shastri Shiksha Samiti, Khanak
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
