The High Court disposed of CWP-24200-2016 by relying on the reasons assigned in a preceding judgment (CWP No.24042-2016, Devki Nandan and others), deciding the petition in the same terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-24200-2016 Date of Decision: November 23, 2016
Lala Ram and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No. 3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No
.......
Present: Mr.S.K.Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners.
SURYA KANT, J.
For the reasons assigned in CWP No.24042-2016 ( Devki
Nandan and others vs State of Haryana and others ) decided on November
21, 2016, this petition is also disposed of in the same terms.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE
November 23, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? 2. Whether reportable ?
Yes/No Yes/No
Meenu 2016.12.02 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CWP No.24042-2016 (Devki Nandan and others vs State of Haryana and others)Relied on¶13
Lala Ram and others
State of Haryana and others
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
