Disposed

Kumbh Co-Operative L & C Society Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC9 Nov 2016CWP/23167/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil writ petition regarding the rejection of a tender bid, the Court directed the respondent to pass a reasoned order on the petitioner's representation within ten days after affording a hearing opportunity, disposing the petition without deciding on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to decide the representation dated 30.09.2016 by passing a speaking order after hearing, within ten days.

Kumbh Co-Operative L & C Society… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

109

¶3

Civil Writ Petition No.23167 of 2016 Date of decision: November 09, 2016

¶4

The Kumbh Co-operative L & C Society Ltd.

¶5

....Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

State of Punjab and others

¶8

.....Respondents

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶10

¶11

Present: Mr. Swarn Tiwana, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

¶14

The petitioner has approached this Court by way of instant writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of e-tender dated 14.10.2016 (Annexure P-1) (colly.) and also objection/rejection (Annexure P-3) uploaded by the respondents, vide which the tenders of the petitioner was rejected. Further prayer has also been made to stay the further process of e-tenders (Annexure P-1) which has not allotted till now.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that for the relief claimed in the writ petition, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 30.09.2016 (Annexure P-9) to the Deputy Commissioner, Fatehgarh Sahib with regard to the rejection of the tender bid submitted by the petitioner in pursuance to the tender notice dated 14.10.2016 (Annexure P-1), but no action has so far been taken thereon. It was prayed that a direction be issued to the respondents

¶16

Sonia Kinra 2016.11.11 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶17

Civil Writ Petition No.23167 of 2016

¶18

-2-

¶19

to decide the same in a time bound manner after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶20

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of the present petition by directing the concerned respondent to take a decision on the representation dated 30.09.2016 (Annexure P-9), in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

¶21

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

¶22

November 09, 2016

¶23

(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE

¶24

sonia gugnani

¶25

Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No

¶26

Whether reportable? Yes/No

¶27

Sonia Kinra 2016.11.11 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Kumbh Co-Operative L & C Society Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumbh Co-Operative L & C Society Ltd. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parveen Kumar Vs Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh through Its Secy. and Ors.

Punjab National Bank Vs District Magistrate Gurgaon and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Vs Punjab and Sind Bank and Anr.

Neha Vs Chief Manager, State Bank of Patiala and Ors.

M/S Mohit Metal Trading Company Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Om Parkash Vs State of Punjab & Ors.