The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner seeking mandamus against illegal encroachment on public property, leaving parties to avail alternate remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
110
Civil Writ Petition No.22876 of 2016 Date of Decision: November 07, 2016
Civil Lines Welfare Society
....Petitioner
versus
The State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Sonia Kinra 2016.11.08 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No.22876 of 2016
-2-
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
November 07, 2016
(RAMENDRA JAIN) JUDGE
sonia gugnani
Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable?
Yes/No
Yes/No
Sonia Kinra 2016.11.08 12:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Civil Lines Welfare Society
The State of Punjab
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
