A compromise was reached between the petitioners and the respondents in a CWP. The High Court noted the settlement and disposed of the petition accordingly.
None; petition disposed of due to settlement between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No.22334 of 2015(O&M)
DATE OF DECISION : 18.1.2016
Kashmir Singh and another
PETITIONERS
VERSUS
Superintending Canal Officer and others RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER
Present:Ms.Parveen Dahiya for Shri Shri S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri Anant Kataria, D.A.G. Punjab.
Shri J.S.Brar, Advocate.
MAHESH GROVER, J.
Reply on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 has been filed in Court today indicating that the matter has been settled between the petitioners and the private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the
compromise, she does not wish to press the instant petition.
Disposed of as such.
(MAHESH GROVER) January 18, 2016 JUDGE GD
GHANSHYAM DASS 2016.01.20 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document high court chandigarh
Kashmir Singh
another
Superintending Canal Officer
Mahesh Grover
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
