Dismissed
Krishan Lal & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/21908/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.21908 of 2010 Date of decision: 30.09.2016
Krishan Lal and others
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. L.S. Virk, Addl. AG, Punjab for the respondents -State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel has filed additional affidavit of Sh. Balbir Singh Dhol, Director of Public Instructions (SE), Punjab, who is present in person, in the Court and the same is taken on record.
Learned State counsel on the basis of para No.7 of the affidavit submits that the relief sought in the present writ petition has been granted to the petitioner and now nothing survives because the amount has already been paid and the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
However, in case, anything survives in the present writ petition, the petitioner is at liberty to move application for recalling of the order.
| 30.09.2016 | (DAYA CHAUDHARY) |
|---|---|
| neetu Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable |
JUDGE √ Yes/No √ Yes/No |
Neetu Rani 2016.10.04 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Krishan Lal and others
State of Punjab and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court