Disposed

Jit Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC21 Oct 2016CWP/21822/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition alleging land utilization without compensation for an irrigation embankment. The court directed a fact-finding enquiry by the Irrigation Department and potential proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, without expressing views on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Punjab, to hold a fact-finding enquiry and initiate proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 if necessary.

Jit Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.21822 of 2016. Date of Decision: October 21, 2016

¶3

Jit Singh and others ......Petitioners

¶4

versus

¶5

The State of Punjab and others

¶6

.....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.

¶8

¶9

Present: Mr.S.S.Rangi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.NDS Mann, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

Surya Kant, J . (Oral)

¶16

Notice of motion.

¶17

On our asking, Mr.NDS Mann, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶18

Let six copies of the writ petition be supplied to learned State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶19

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from the respondents at this stage.

¶20

The petitioners are residents of village Gurditpura, Block Patran, District Patiala. They allege that their land fully described in the head note of the writ petition, situated within the revenue estate of their Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.11.09 13:04 village has been utilized for the construction of embankments from RD-0I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶21

CWP No.21822 of 2016

¶22

[2]

¶23

13000 on both sides of village Sagra Para so as to prevent the flooding of area by river Ghaggar. The grievance of the petitioners is that their land has been utilized without any acquisition or payment of compensation.

¶24

The petitioners have pointed-out that some of the land-owners of village Sagra Para, whose lands were also utilized in the same manner, earlier approached this Court through CWP No.8459 of 2013 Jagir Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others in which directions were issued to the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Punjab, to call for the records and verify whether their lands were utilized by the Irrigation Department without paying any compensation. It is stated that contempt proceedings were initiated for non-compliance of the above-stated directions, whereupon the respondent-authorities have paid compensation amount of Rs.18,90,72,072/- to the affected land-owners.

¶25

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it appears to us that the factual averments made by the petitioners are required to be verified by the authorities and if it is found correct that their lands have been utilized for a public purpose without acquiring it in accordance with law, they too are entitled to seek compensation on the parity of the writ-petitioners in CWP No.8459 of 2013 decided on 25.07.2013. The writ petition is thus disposed of without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Punjab, to hold a fact-finding enquiry and if the stand taken by the petitioners is found to be correct, let appropriate proceedings under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for the acquisition of petitioners' land and to pay them compensation in accordance with law.

¶26

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.11.09 13:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶27

[3]

¶28

CWP No.21822 of 2016

¶29

The needful shall be done within a period of six months from

¶30

the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶31

Ordered accordingly.