Dismissed

M/S Delta Guards Pvt. Ltd. v. B.D. Sharma Pgims Rohtak and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Sept 2016CWP/20343/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

M/s Delta Guards Private Limited filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought quashing of an assessment letter and certain tenders issued by the Respondents. During arguments, the petitioner withdrew the petitions with liberty to approach alternative forums.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Civil Court or avail alternative remedies.

M/S Delta Guards Pvt. Ltd. Vs B.D… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP No. 20343 of 2016 Decided on : 29.09.2016

¶3

M/s Delta Guards Private Limited

¶4

. . . Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences and another

¶7

. . . Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

¶9

PRESENT: Mr. Gaurav Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. ****

¶10

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

¶11

The petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia seeking quashing of letter/communication dated 27.07.2016, which is appended as Annexure P-10 with the writ petition, issued by respondent No.2, whereby, the performance of the petitioner has been assessed to be 'non satisfactory'. A further prayer for quashing of tender bearing No.Cell-II/2016, dated 02.08.2016 (Annexure P-11), further revised on 16.08.2016 (P-13), issued by respondent No.2 for 'Bearer Services of Hospital Areas' and another tender bearing No.CE-II/2016, dated 02.08.2016 (Annexure P-13), revised on 16,.08.2016 (Annexure P-14) has also been made.

¶12

After arguing for sometime, when the Bench was not inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner, he prayed that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court or to avail any other alternative remedy as may be available to it, in accordance with law.

¶13

Jawala Ram 2016.10.18 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶14

CWP No. 20343 of 2016

¶15

- 2 -

¶16

Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to it, in

¶17

accordance with law.

¶18

(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE

¶19

(RAMENDRA JAIN) September 29, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶20

Jawala Ram 2016.10.18 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

M/S Delta Guards Pvt. Ltd. v. B.D. Sharma Pgims Rohtak and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Delta Guards Pvt. Ltd. v. B.D. Sharma Pgims Rohtak and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daljit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S B.R.Solvex Pvt.Ltd. Vs Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.

Union of India Vs Ashok Kumar Jain and Ors.

Harpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

M/S Gr Industries and Ors. Vs Authorized Officer Allahabad Bank

Basudev @ Vasudev Vs Chd Administration & Ors.