Premature writ petition dismissed pending success of proposed Rules amendment to generate a fresh cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18165-2016 Date of Decision: September 20, 2016
Shiv Prabhakar and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Present: Mr.J.S.Gill, Advocate for the petitioners.
SURYA KANT, J.
It is stated that contempt petition for non-compliance of the order dated 12.02.2013 is pending consideration.
In our considered view it is only after the proposed amendment in the Rules is taken to its logical conclusion that the petitioners can possibly have a fresh cause of action. We, thus, dismiss this writ petition at this stage as premature with liberty to the petitioners to purse the contempt petition and thereafter, if need be, to file a fresh petition.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE
September 20, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Meenu 2016.09.23 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Shiv Prabhakar and others
State of Punjab and others
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
