This single paragraph order dismisses a writ petition for want of particulars regarding deceptive photographs, allowing a fresh petition on the same cause of action.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file fresh petition on same cause of action with relevant photographs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18088-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 04, 2016
Nepal Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No 3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No 4. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No 5. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.
.......
Present: Mr.Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
SURYA KANT, J.
The petitioner has failed to comply with the previous order dated 02.09.2016. The photographs on record are quite deceptive. Writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of particulars though with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action alongwith relevant photographs.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE
October 04, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE
Meenu 2016.10.07 13:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Nepal Singh
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
