Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. Polc-Ii Faridabad and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
BENCH NO.3 507 CWP-17953-1996 REMINGTON RAND…
BENCH NO.3 507 CWP-17953-1996 REMINGTON RAND…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DAILY LOK ADALAT
BENCH NO.3
507 CWP-17953-1996 REMINGTON RAND OF INDIA LTD. V/S POLC-II FARIDABAD AND ORS.
Present: Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate For the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Sharma, DAG Haryana
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite of possible attempts, he has not been able to contact the petitioner. In the circumstances, counsel submits that this writ petition be consigned to record with liberty to him to get it revived in case of need.
For the stand taken by the learned counsel, this writ petition be consigned to the record. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to get it revived in case of need.
(G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT
(N.K. KAPOOR) MEMBER
September 22, 2016
Naina Rajput
NAINA KATHIAT 2016.09.26 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Remington Rand of India Ltd.
Policell Faridabad and Ors.
G.C. Garg
N.K. Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court