Single-page order granting judgment based on the reasons recorded in a previous order passed in CWP No.8719 of 2014 titled 'Lilu Ram vs. State of Haryana and another' dated 29.09.2016 in a CWP filed in this Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vinod Kumar 2016.10.03 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.17660 of 2014 Date of decision:29.09.2016
Ram Rattan
...Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner & Secretary to Govt. of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, and Mr. Gaurav Gogna, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.P.Chahar, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate, for the Gram Panchayat.
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral)
For orders, see the detailed reasons recorded in the order passed
in CWP No.8719 of 2014 titled as “Lilu Ram vs. State of Haryana and
another” of even date.
September 29, 2016 (Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge Whether speaking / reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Ram Rattan
Commissioner & Secretary to Govt. of Haryana and others
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
