Learned counsel for the respondent stated that the workman was taken back in service, paid arrears, and regularized in 2002, rendering the writ petition infructuous, which the court accepted.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BENCH NO.3
DAILY LOK ADALAT
515 CWP-17387-2002 GENERAL MANAGER,HARYANA ROADWAYS ROHTAK V/S SURESH KUMAR AND ORS.
Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, DAG Haryana
Mr. Joginder Singh, Clerk O/o General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Rohtak.
The Labour Court ordered reinstatement of the workman on his previous post with continuity of service and 75% back wages. The said award was challenged by the General Manager, Haryana Raodways, Rohtak.
Mr. Joginder Singh, Clerk, O/o GM, HR, Rohtak states that the workman had been taken back in service and was also paid the arrears as directed by the Labour Court. He further stated that the workman was regularized in the year, 2002 and therefore, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous and be disposed of as such.
We order accordingly.
(G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT
(N.K. KAPOOR) MEMBER
December 07, 2016
Naina Rajput
NAINA KATHIAT 2016.12.09 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is infructuous as the workman has been regularized and back wages paid
1 provisions across 1 enactments
GENERAL MANAGER, HARYANA ROADWAYS ROHTAK
SURESH KUMAR AND ORS.
G.C. GARG
N.K. KAPOOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
