The petitioner being permitted to withdraw Writ Petition CWP No.16764 of 2015 as it became infructuous due to the reply filed by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2016.02.18 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CWP No.16764 of 2015 Date of Decision:18.02.2016
Sudhir Singla
...Petitioner
Versus
Food Corporation of India and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. K.C. Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for the respondents.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he
may be permitted to withdraw the petition as it has been rendered infructuous in view of the reply filed by the respondents.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
February 18, 2016 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
Sudhir Singla
Food Corporation of India
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
