Orders passed by a single judge bench referring to an application for allowance, and mentions disposal of CWP-856-2006. A single line order regarding CWP dismissed. No substantive judicial reasoning provided.
Application allowed; no order required for CM-7033-2015; reference made to order in CWP-856-2006 for CWP-16363-2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CM-20135-2007 and CM-7033-2015 and CWP-16363-2005 (O&M)
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM-20135-2007 and CM-7033-2015 and CWP-16363-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 07, 2016
HMD Technologies Limited
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not? Yes/No 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes/No.
3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes/No
Present: Mr.Shailendra Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Salil Nayyar, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana. Mr.Kamal Sehgal, Advocate for HSIIDC.
SURYA KANT, J.
CM-20135-2007
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is
allowed.
CWP-16363-2005
For orders, see order of even date passed in CWP-856-2006 ( M/s
Trim India P.Ltd. Versus State of Haryana and others ).
CM-7033-2015
Since the main case has been decided on merit, nor order is
Meenu 2016.12.07 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
CM-20135-2007 and CM-7033-2015 and CWP-16363-2005 (O&M)
- 2 -
required to be passed in this application.
( SURYA KANT )
JUDGE
November 07, 2016 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No 2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No
Meenu 2016.12.07 10:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s Trim India P.Ltd. Versus State of Haryana and othersReferred¶20
CWP-856-2006 (M/s Trim India P.Ltd. Versus State of Haryana and others)
HMD Technologies Limited
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
