Laxmi Kant & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15990 of 2016 Decided on : 25.10.2016
Laxmi Kant and others
. . . Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab others
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Amandeep Kansal, Advocate for
Mr. Lakhwinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondents No.6 to 8.
Mr. Arun Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.9.
Mr. M.K. Singla, Advocate for respondent No.10.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondents No.6 to 8 states that in terms of order dated 28th September, 2016, an affidavit has been filed in the Registry.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(RAMENDRA JAIN) October 25, 2016 JUDGE J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Jawala Ram 2016.10.26 15:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Laxmi Kant and others
State of Punjab others
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court