One-judge brief order stating that detailed reasons are recorded in a sister judgment (CWP No.13212 of 2012) decided on the same date and title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VINOD KUMAR 2016.04.26 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13239 of 2012 Date of decision:22.04.2016
Hafiz Manzoor Hassan
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain
Present: Mr. Arvinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. V. Ramswaroop, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Gulam Nabi Malik, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Mr. S.K.Jain, Advocate, with Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate, for the Punjab Wakf Board. *****
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
For orders, see the detailed reasons recorded in the order passed
in CWP No.13212 of 2012 titled as “Hafiz Abdul Hameed vs. State of
Punjab and others ” of even date.
April 22, 2016 ( Rakesh Kumar Jain) vinod* Judge
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
