Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after the respondent produced a copy of the impugned order for the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.12888 of 2016 Date of Decision: July 01, 2016
Export Import Bank of India
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate, Ludhiana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.B.CHAUDHARI
Present: Mr.I.P.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Dipinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.P.S.Bajwa, Addl.AG, Punjab.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.(Oral)
Learned State counsel has produced a copy of the order passed by the respondent. The copy of the same was received by learned counsel for the petitioner as well.
In view of the above development in this case, the writ petition
has become infructuous and the same stands disposed of.
(M.JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
July 01, 2016 (A.B.CHAUDHARI) seema JUDGE
SEEMA RANI 2016.07.04 10:10 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document
Export Import Bank of India
District Magistrate, Ludhiana
M.Jeyapaul
A.B.Chaudhari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
