Writ petition seeking quashing of an order appointing an Administrator was dismissed as infructuous because the terms of the Administrator had expired, rendering the petitioner unable to challenge a fresh order if appointed. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.12707 of 2015
Date of decision: 17.05.2016
Piara Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL
Present: - Mr. H.S Minhas, Advocate, for Mr. Amrik Singh, advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. B.M. Vinayak, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. Arvind Mittal, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 10.
PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (ORAL)
Instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 09.06.2015 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No.3 whereby respondent No.5 has been appointed as Administrator of Gram Panchayat Village Darauli, Block and District Rupnagar.
Learned counsel for respondents No.6 to 10 states that terms of the Administrator has already expired and respondent No.5 is no more performing the duties of Administrator.
In view of above, present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous. In case, the new Administrator is appointed, petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the fresh order.
(Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge
May 17, 2016
RAVINDER SINGH 2016.05.18 10:33I attest to the accuracy andR.S. authenticity of this document
R.S.
Piara Singh
State of Punjab
PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
