The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a writ petition without commenting on merits, directing the second respondent to act on the petitioner's representation regarding land mutation within three months.
Direction to respondent No.2 to take appropriate action on the representation dated 12.01.2016 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
126
Civil Writ Petition No.11028 of 2016 Date of decision: 30th May, 2016
Jasmer Singh
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL
Present: Ms. Monika Tanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
PARAMJEET SINGH DHALIWAL, J. (Oral)
Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate action on the representations filed by the petitioner on 10.10.2015, 12.01.2016 and 12.01.2016 (Annexures P-5(a), P-5(b) and P-6), respectively.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had purchased land measuring 15 kanals, 13 marlas vide registered sale deed dated 14.10.1992 and the mutation No.2059 was sanctioned. In spite of that, entry in this regard has not been effected in the revenue record.
SONIA GUGNANI 2016.06.01 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No.11028 of 2016
-2-
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the paper-book, however, without commenting on merits of the case, instant petition is disposed of, with a direction to respondent No.2, to take appropriate action on the representation dated 12.01.2016 (Annexure P-6), filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
May 30, 2016
(Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal) Judge
sonia gugnani
SONIA GUGNANI 2016.06.01 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the record authorities of the respondent should take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation regarding mutation of land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jasmer Singh
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
