The petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition became infructuous as relief was already granted. The court disposed of the petition without paragraph numbers.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2016.03.15 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CWP No.10455 of 2014 Date of Decision:14.03.2016
Ram Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate, for the respondents.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as the necessary relief has been granted to the petitioner.
Petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, in case petitioner still feels aggrieved, he would be at liberty to seek his appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
March 14, 2016 kapil
(SABINA) JUDGE
Ram Kumar
Union of India
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
