A petition was dismissed as infructuous because the related FIR was quashed in a connected petition passed on the even date.
Disposed as infructuous consequence of quashing of connected FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No.1733 of 2014 Date of Order:30.11.2016
Simranjit Kaur and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Sunny Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that since the FIR has been quashed vide order of even date passed in connected petition i.e. CRM-M-22666 of 2016, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
November 30, 2016 (ANITA CHAUDHRY) nt JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Naresh Kumar 2016.12.05 12:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Simranjit Kaur
another
State of Haryana
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
