The criminal revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on any date.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Revision No. 153 of 2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.05.2016
Amarjit Singh
.....Petitioner
Versus
Tajinder Singh and another ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: None for the petitioner.
None for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Deep Singh, AAG, Punjab.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Even on the second call, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner even on the last date.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
May 31, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.06.02 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Amarjit Singh
Tajinder Singh
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
