Attorney in favour of her husband Dalip Singh. On 24.6.2008 her husband executed an agreement to sell two shops for a sale consideration of Rs.12,00,000/- in favour of accused Dilawar Singh and received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as earnest money. The sale deed was to be executed on 24.6.2010. Since accused Dilawar Singh failed to execute the sale deed and also did not fulfill the terms and conditions of the agreement, he did not have any right to get the sale deed executed in his favour. It was further averred that in the months of November and December, 2010, the husband of the complainant was out of station and accused Dilawar Singh and Smt. Banesh Devi knew about the same. In the absence of husband of the complainant, accused Dilawar Singh and Smt. Banesh Devi came to her house and pressurised her to get the sale deed executed and when the complainant refused to do so, the two accused threatened her with dire consequences and lodging of false case against her. At that time, accused Manphul and Rajender were present outside her house. Both Dilawar Singh and Smt. Banesh Devi, in connivance with Manphul and Rajender took the complainant to the office of the Sub Registrar where her signatures were obtained on the sale deed by stating that the sale deed was in terms of the agreement dated 24.6.2008. However, later on, she came to know that the sale deed executed by her was not of the property mentioned in the agreement dated 24.6.2008 but was of a separate property. She reported the matter to the police but no action was taken against the accused.
