From the record, I find that in the present case, complaint has been filed by Vinod Gupta against Amar Chand Amar, Satish Chand Amar, Prem Chand Amar, Suresh Chand Amar and Vikram Jain under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. mainly stating that the complainant and accused Nos.1 to 4 are the step brothers. Father of the complainant has two wives. Accused No.1 to 4 were born from Smt. Premwati, whereas the complainant and his brother and sisters, namely, Vimal Chand, Madhu Gupta and Beena Aggarwal were born from Sheela Devi-second wife. As per the allegations grand-father of the complainant and accused Nos.1 to 4, namely, Shri Shyam Lal had two sons, namely Harish Chander and Bhermanand. Bhermanand remained unmarried during his lifetime. Shyam Lal partitioned his property between his two sons, namely, Harish Chander and Bhermanand in the year 1959. Accused Nos.1 to 4 fraudulently and dishonestly got transferred the property left by Shyam Lal in their favour without impleading Harish Chander and complainant, his brother and sister as a party. It is also stated that a civil suit was filed which was pending before the Court. The Court made it clear that if they alienate any property, they shall make a clear recital in the deed to the effect that the litigation regarding property is pending before the Court. It is also stated that accused No.1 in connivance with accused No.2 and 3 transferred the property by way of gift deed in the name of accused No.3. The parties to the civil suit
