Allowed

Dheeraj Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC18 Oct 2016CRM-M/4540/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail in a matrimonial dispute involving offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, the single-judge bench made the ad-interim bail order absolute contingent upon the deposit of a surety of `2 lacs.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim anticipatory bail made absolute subject to deposit of `2 lacs surety and abiding by investigation conditions.

Dheeraj Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

CRM-M-4540-2016

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-4540-2016 Date of Decision:- 18.10.2016

Dheeraj Kumar

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

¶9

....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Brijinder Singh Loomba, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Manpreet Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.

¶13

Mr. Ranjan Lakhanpal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶14

¶15

RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)

¶16

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.245 dated 16.12.2015, registered at Police Station City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 323 and 34 IPC.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is

¶18

a getting a salary of `15000/- per month and is residing in a rented accommodation. He has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of vague and general allegations. Moreover, it was second marriage

¶19

Naresh Kumar 2016.10.20 11:51 I attest to the accuracy andbetween the parties. integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M-4540-2016

¶21

-2-

¶22

Learned State counsel on instructions from investigating officer has informed that the recovery of gold ornaments is still to be effected.

¶23

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 08.02.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall deposit a surety of `2 lacs before the trial Court. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶24

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶25

October 18, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶26

Naresh Kumar 2016.10.20 11:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Dheeraj Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dheeraj Kumar v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaswinder Kaur @ Jasminder Kaur and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Bhai Lakhwinder Singh Vs Sgpc Amritsar & Ors.

Raj Kumar Sehgal Vs Presiding Officer & Anr.

Amarjit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sukhdev Singh Vs S.G.P.C.

Rupinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Ors.