Court quashed FIR 124 registered under Sections 354 and 506 IPC based on a voluntary compromise between the parties, as reported by JMIC, allowing the instant petition and discharging the petitioner from consequent proceedings.
Quashing of FIR No.124 and consequent proceedings qua the petitioner; parties bound by compromise terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
��������������������������������������� �������������
����������������������������� ���������������������� ������������
��� !"�!#��$#%��
� ��&'�$�$�#'� ('�)�)
��!�'��*�&�#+! �,�!#���'��
� ���')-�#.'#�)
�����������/0��������12���������������2���3
��������
Present : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Aulakh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent no.2.
�������
�������������������������
The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.124 dated 06.06.2015 registered under Sections 354 and 506 IPC at Police Station Kotwali Kapurthala, District Kapurthala and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise (Annexure P52) arrived at between the parties.
Report has been received from learned JMIC, Kapurthala after statements of the parties were recorded regarding the compromise. Learned JMIC has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. Learned JMIC has also sent copy of statements of the parties.
RAJ KUMAR 2016.03.10 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
�����������������������������������
����
Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioner is the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.
No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR
pending.
In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in ����������������������������������������������������������� ��������� ��� ��!������"�#� , approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in $��������������������������������������������"���"��� ���� , the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed qua the petitioner.
Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.
��� ��!�"� ������ ���������������� ����� �����
RAJ KUMAR 2016.03.10 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pardeep Rajput
Respondent No.2
The State
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
