submitting statements of witnesses namely Naresh Tyagi, Meenaxi Sharma, Smt.Rajesh and Om Parkash under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Learned trial Court held that Investigating Officer appeared before the Court and moved an application that statements of witnesses Meenaxi, Om Parkash and Smt.Rajesh have been misplaced and a date be given for recording the statements of aforesaid witnesses. The Court further held that perusal of the file shows that accused Ramesh Khatri had filed an application dated 09.06.2016 for issuing direction to Investigating Officer to supply the copies of statements of witnesses namely Rishi Kumar Sharma, Naresh Tyagi, Smt.Kiran Tuteja, Anita Sharma, Minakshi Sharma, Om Parkash, Sunita Sharma, Smt.Rajesh, Satbir and Jaspal. Statements of Rishi Kumar Sharma, Anita Sharma, Sunita Sharma, Kiran Tuteja, Jaspal and Satbir are already placed on record. However, the Investigating Officer has mentioned that statements of witnesses namely Meenaxi, Om Parkash, Rajesh were misplaced, which were recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. The Investigating Officer has not given any reasonable explanation regarding missing of the aforesaid statements from police file. The Investigating Officer has also not given any valid reason regarding statement of witness namely Naresh Tyagi recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the trial Court, ordered the deletion of the names of witnesses namely Naresh Tyagi, Meenaxi, Om Parkash and Smt.Rajesh as per the impugned order dated 19.08.2016. Then the accused-petitioner filed a revision petition, which was dismissed as the impugned order being interlocutory order and revision petition is not maintainable.
