Allowed

Ujjagar Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Dec 2016CRM-M/40328/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving offenses under Sections 324, 323, 498-A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC. The court allowed the petition, making a previous interim order absolute subject to conditions of Section 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed and order dated 4.12.2015 granting interim bail made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2)(i)(ii)(iii) CrPC.

Ujjagar Singh Vs State of Punjab — Dowry and Cruelty | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

-1-

¶2

Crl. Misc. No. M-40328 of 2015

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

Crl. Misc. No. M-40328 of 2015 Date of Decision: 08.12.2016

Ujjagar Singh

......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

¶10

Present: Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

¶12

Mr. Amjad Khan, Advocate for the complainant.

¶13

¶14

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL)

¶15

Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 106 dated 11.7.2015, registered under Sections 324, 323, 498-A, 406, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Doraha, District Khanna.

¶16

Some gold articles have been returned.

¶17

Counsel for the complainant states that a gold set and one ring

¶18

have not been returned.

¶19

Petitioner is the father-in-law. The husband is abroad.

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner states that whatever was available with them had been returned. He further states that pursuant to the order dated 4.12.2015, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the

¶21

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶22

-2-

¶23

Crl. Misc. No. M-40328 of 2015

¶24

investigation.

¶25

State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶26

There is a dispute regarding the articles, the complainant will have to prove it at the trial.

¶27

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 4.12.2015 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

¶29

December 08, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶30

Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Ujjagar Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ujjagar Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munni and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Paramjit Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Naveen Kumar Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Jagdeep Sharma Vs Ut of Chandigarh & Anr.

Gurpreet Singh Vs State of Punjab

Rajni Vs State of Punjab & Anr.