Petitioners sought a specific relief which was held to have become infructuous because the respondent received the remaining amount. The petition was dismissed.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-39414 of 2015 Date of Decision: 04.07.2016
Saroj Rani and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
Sardha Ram
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikram Bali, Advocate for the respondent.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Counsel for the respondent states that they have received the
remaining amount.
Counsel for the petitioners states that this petition has been
rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
July 04, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.07.05 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Saroj Rani and another
Sardha Ram
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
