Dismissed
Sukraj Singh v. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/34837/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
114
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-34837 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 09, 2016
Sukhraj Singh
...Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Rajiv Kataria, Advocate for the petitioner.
INDERJIT SINGH, J.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of permission to go and visit Canada for three months to let him do his personal works, which prayer has been declined by learned JMIC, Amritsar, vide order dated 09.02.2016.
Vide separate order of even date passed in CRM No.M-28624 of 2015, the FIR No.166 dated 18.06.2015 against the petitioner under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Jandiala Guru along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom have been quashed, therefore, there is no need to seek permission of this Court to visit Canada and the present petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
| December | 09, 2016 | (INDERJIT SINGH) |
|---|---|---|
| Vgulati | JUDGE | |
| Whether speaking/reasoned | No | |
| and |
Whether reportable | No |
Vineet Gulati 2016.12.23 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sukhraj Singh
State of Punjab
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court