The petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-2933 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.04.2016
Poonam
... Petitioner
versus
Vijay Kumar Jindal
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Petitioner Poonam in person.
ANITA CHAUDHRY , J(ORAL)
Petitioner states that the Apex Court has already transferred the case to Chandigarh Courts. She refers to order dated 04.04.2016 and submits that she wants to withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
April 26, 2016 Jiten
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
JITEN SHARMA 2016.04.26 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Poonam
Vijay Kumar Jindal
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
