The High Court allowed the bail petition, making the interim order dated 3.8.2016 absolute. The petitioner was ordered to remain on bail subject to conditions of appearance and no absence without cause.
Interim order dated 3.8.2016 made absolute; petitioner to remain on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 26265 of 2016 Date of decision: 19.10.2016
Praval Goyal
Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana and anr
Respondent
Present: Mr. Aakash Singla, Advocate. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, AAG, Haryana
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
It has been informed that the petitioner has already put in appearance before the summoning court pursuant to the interim order passed on 3.8.2016.
The petition is allowed. Interim order dated 3.8.2016 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner will remain on bail against the bail bonds already furnished subject to the condition that he will continue to appear before the trial court and will not absent himself without any sufficient cause.
October 19 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Tapinder Singh Mann 2016.10.19 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Praval Goyal
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
