Dharam Singh v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge permitted oral application for anticipatory bail regarding IPC 341/379-A snatching offence. Court held no case out for bail.
Single judge permitted oral application for anticipatory bail regarding IPC 341/379-A snatching offence. Court held no case out for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M 258/2016
104
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision:21.01.2016
Dharam Singh
.............Petitioner
v.
State of Haryana
.............Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH
Present:Mr.Jangvir Singh Hooda,Advocate for the petitioner
Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral)
Prayer is for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.796 dated 11.12.2015 under Sections 341/379-A IPC, PS City Palwal.Distt.Palwal.
As per allegations petitioner alongwith his co-accused Harinder had snatched gold chain from the neck of wife of complainant. Co-accused Harinder was apprehended at the spot whereas petitioner managed to escape.
Counsel for the petitioner heard at length.
Keeping in view the nature of offence,no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.
Dismissed.
21.01.2016 (Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge
RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2016.01.21 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out when the offence is snatching of a gold chain.
Dharam Singh
State of Haryana
Jaswant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court