Petitioner who joined investigation in bounty/anticipatory bail case allowed; interim order made absolute with conditions.
Impugned interim order dated 28.07.2016 made absolute; petitioner shall join investigation as required, not tamper with evidence, not leave India without permission, and comply with Section 438(2) Cr.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-24239 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Order: 22.10.2016
Rajiv Saini
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. K.D.S.SodhiAdvocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, Asst. A.G.,Punjab
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instructions submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 28.07.2016, the petitioner has joined the investigation.
Since the petitioner has joined the investigation, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 28.07.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioner will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation and will not leave India without permission of the Court and will comply with the conditions contained in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
October 22, 2016 (ANITA CHAUDHRY) nt JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Naresh Kumar 2016.10.22 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajiv Saini
State of Punjab
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
