The High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous petition by referring to a separate detailed order in a connected case without providing independent reasoning.
Criminal miscellaneous petition allowed via reference to separate detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-2410 of 2016 (O&M)
.....
Date of decision:29.8.2016
Devender Kumar and another
.....Petitioners
v.
State of Haryana and another
.....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikramjit Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.
Mr. C.R. Dahiya, Advocate for the complainant.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. For reasons,
see separate detailed order passed today in Criminal Misc. No.M-1035 of 2016, Babita and another v. State of Haryana.
August 29, 2016. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp NOTE: Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.30 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Devender Kumar and another
State of Haryana
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
