Raj Kaur v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Petitioner withdrew the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2369-2016 Date of Decision:- 21.11.2016
Raj Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Tapish Kumar Gupta, Advocate for Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. APS Gill, AAG, Punjab.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner intends to
withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for.
November 21, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Naresh Kumar 2016.11.23 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Raj Kaur
State of Punjab
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court