Parveen v. Ut of Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-23045 of 2016 Date of decision : October 20, 2016
Parveen ....Petitioner
versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh
....Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh
Present : Mr. SK Khurcha, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Goyal, APP, UT Chandigarh
Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
( Fateh Deep Singh ) October 20, 2016 Judge 'tiwana' Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Whether Reportable ? Yes/No
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parveen
- respondent
State of U.T. Chandigarh
Coram
Fateh Deep Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/23045/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court