Sushma Sharma v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
One-line order: Petition disposed as infructuous after petitioner appeared before trial court. No substantive legal proposition.
One-line order: Petition disposed as infructuous after petitioner appeared before trial court. No substantive legal proposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 22481 of 2014 Date of decision:- 19.2.2016
Susham Sharma
Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab
Respondent
Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Jashanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
It has been informed that the petitioner has already appeared
before the trial court.
The petition is thus disposed of as having rendered
infructuous.
February 19 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2016.02.19 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Susham Sharma
State of Punjab
M.M.S.Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court