Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-22310 of 2015 Date of Decision: 09.05.2016
Sudhir Kumar Bullagan
......Petitioner
Versus
Rama Bullagan
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karamjit Verma, Advocate for the respondent.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be
permitted to withdraw the petition
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY)
JUDGE
May 09, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.05.11 11:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sudhir Kumar Bullagan
Rama Bullagan
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
