The High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition making an interim anticipatory bail order absolute. The decision followed the petitioner's voluntary joining of the investigation.
Interim order dated 21.6.2016 made absolute subject to conditions under S. 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TAPINDER SINGH MANN IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB 2016.07.22 17:00 AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 20820 of 2016 Date of decision: 22.7.2016
Ram Gopal @ Gopal
Petitioner
vs.
State of Haryana
Respondent
Present: Mr. RS Hooda, Advocate. Mr. Vikas Malik, dAG, Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
On the instructions of SI Satbir Singh, it has been informed
that the petitioner has joined the investigation.
In view of said circumstances, the petition is allowed. Interim order dated 21.6.2016 is hereby made absolute subject to all the conditions u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.
July 22 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to make the interim anticipatory bail order absolute upon the petitioner joining the investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Gopal @ Gopal
State of Haryana
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
