Petitioner withdrew criminal miscellaneous petition citing the addition of the POCSO Act. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-19884 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.08.2016
Jeevan Kumar @ Totu
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
Present: Mr. Munish Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition as the POCSO Act has been added and he will file a fresh one.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
August 30, 2016 Gurpreet
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.08.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Jeevan Kumar @ Totu
State of Punjab
Anita Chaudhry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
